Felix Cherniavsky - Research Notes

Added 19th Mar 2022 by Beth Dobson (Archives and Programming Assistant, DCD) / Last update 19th Mar 2022

Maud Allan 1033 51 2008-2-68 compressed.pdf
Maud Allan 1033 51 2008-2-68 compressed.pdf
(No description added)

Felix Cherniavsky - Research Notes

Discover Placeholder
Description
The description of this Item
Collections
The collections that this item appears in.
Maud Allan Research Collection
Tags
Tag descriptions added by humans
Identified Objects
Description of the objects in this Item
Accession Number
DCD's accession number for this Item. It is the unique identifier.
51.2008-2-68
Original Filename
Extracted text
Notes from Chapter 4 -- DIFFERENT WAYS OF BEING SHOCKED . There was the type of person who found anything ' Eastern ' shocking - and in its expressiveness Maud Allan's dancing is ctainly ' Eastern ' The whole garden of Eastern beauty has to our Western minds somthing wicked about it and for that reason no doubt the West built up a school of dancing rigidly technical in its movements and , to that extent , it hoped , devoid of any sensual or individuak expression . Thus th ttiutde of many who condemned Miss Allan's art as Eastern was fundamentally right in its premises . The Times took this poin and deplored it . Another view : Dancing was a ideease , going back to 14th century tradition . Religious and aesthetic view == shocked by the dummy head in Salome . for ex : Archdeacon Sinclair some saw it and rejected it as sensationalism . on the whole : unconvincing and insincere . some saw it as unpleasant , others as ludicrous . Some thought it clever and bizarre . Maud's clothing was centre of shock , though . There was nothing shocking ot even sensually stimulating in her stage appearance ( Prob . true Controversy : is the nude decent or indecent ? ( 10 To the pure everything is pure ( ii ) the only woman a man should see nude is his wife . Crisis in Manchester and Watch Committee differences betn this version and newspapers ' . i . e . Mr. Peacock's visit to London . From these simple facts there arose one of the bitterest and most bulky newspaper controversies that has ever been raised in the Press " For months after Manchester became an object of popular ridicule The absurdity of it all was that Manchester had banned what the King the Prime Mi ister , an Archdeacon [ ? ] and the whole of fashionable London , as well as several thousands of others , had wholeheartedly the pot approvved . This was wärse than calling the kettle black . It was as The Bystander remarked a case of " the Vicar shaking hos head over the blameless Churchwarden " . Refer also to Lines " Maud Allan on a summer's day Dancer daintily in light array .....

Auto-generated content

This item has not been processed