Felix Cherniavsky - Censorship, Dance, and Morality

Added 18th Mar 2022 by Beth Dobson (Archives and Programming Assistant, DCD) / Last update 18th Mar 2022

Maud Allan 927b 51 2008-2-61.jpg
Maud Allan 927b 51 2008-2-61.jpg
(No description added)

Felix Cherniavsky - Censorship, Dance, and Morality

Discover Placeholder
Description
The description of this Item
Collections
The collections that this item appears in.
Maud Allan Research Collection
Tags
Tag descriptions added by humans
Identified Objects
Description of the objects in this Item

Auto-generated content

Auto Tags
Tag descriptions added automatically
text book photo Black and white
Auto Objects
Auto-generated identification of objects in this Item
Auto Description
An autogenerated description of this Item
Text
Face count
Auto-generated number of faces in the Item
0
Accession Number
DCD's accession number for this Item. It is the unique identifier.
51.2008-2-61
Original Filename
Extracted text
T Jan 14,1 Inter Missing This sorrow was further . Since to expose one's self to what is called the proximate Orcusion of sporto become the proximate ocenion or sin to others , is in itsellainful , then taking on the character of the Coca sion or act , it dollows that a panitent who knowingly and voluntarily ex poses himsell to the danger of con mitting brievious ein , or is the occa sion of others committing it is not contrite , and hence cannot receive ab solution in the tribunal of penance . The application of these principles is obvious . It these indecent dances are 3111 Occasion of sin to those who indulge in thom , or iť by indulging in them they themselves become an oc casion of sin to others , and if in the tribunal of penance they refuse to promise to ceuso indulging in them , it follows that they are not sincerely sorry for their sins , and hence cannot receive absolution . By well instructed Catholics these principles are clearly understood , as they are also by the children in our schools , and I only felt it necessary to request the priests of the diocese to call the attention of the people to thern in reference to these vile dances , and to warn both young and old that if they indulged in them , it would be yseless for them to go to confession in the hopo of obtaining absolution . Should any priest be so indiscreet as to attempt to absolve a penitent in these dispositions , the absolution would be worthless , and the contes sion would bring a curse rather than & blessing I had long been convinced that these dances Wero working sad havoc among young men and women , and I had long felt that it was my duty to speak out , but I had no reliable in formation on which to base a con demnation . Fortunately , this was sup plied by a society of Catholic gentle men In Memphis , namely , the Knights of Columbus , who , in their corporate capacity , published a circular con demning these dances . They further publicly avowed their purpose to ex . pel any member who should attend any entertainment at which such dances were indulged in , or who , en tering & place of amusement , should not at once leave it on learning that these dances were to be part of the programme of the evening . They further called upon Catholic parents to ostracize and exclude from their homes all young men and wom en who engage in these dances , and warned them to shield their sons and daughters from the slimy touch of such moral lepers . They called them Infamous dances , the spawn of the red - light district , and the prolific means of securing from the homes of purity and virtuo recruits for tho bawdy house . These are strong words , used by gentlemen who seemingly knew what They were talking about , and they an ply Justify me in admonishing Catho Tion that they who do such things aro not of Chrlet , and cannot hope to re celve Ills pardon , peace , and blessing . TIIOMAS S. BYRNI , Cathollo Bishop of Nashvillo . Nashville , Tenn . Bishop Olmsted's Donbts , In reply to your request for an ex pression of oplnion as to the harm ful effect of the new dances in America , I would say that I hardly . feel competent to express an opinion on that point , seeing that I have not the means of knowing what moral ef fect they may be producing . I am almost never present at balls or dane ing parties , and have never seen the so - called new dances . " I should judge from what I have heard and read about them , however , that there must be somethin moralizing in the use of them , your editorial the other day you con tended , I believe , that the lanmornity 11 anywhere , must be in the dancers and not in the dance . Probably that is so ; but is it not tantamount to sayins that the intoxication is in the drun ard , not in the stuff that he drinks ? Yet , as there is something in tho liquor which makes a man drunts , may it not be that there is something in these new dances which beguilos the men and women who practice them into immodesty ? From all that I have read on the subject I should think there must be something of that sort ; and if so , it does seem to me thet it were better to prohibit them . I am not a political Prohibitionist ; but I do approve of 119 license for hotel bars and saloons , bo cause it is wrong to make it so ensy for men to ruin themselves and their famllies and to lend young men and eyen boys into the sulmeldestruotion . CHARLES TYLER JOLMSTED , Episcopal Bishop of Central New York . Utica , N. Y. Inclined to Oppose Them . In reply to your Inquiry of Jan. 9. concerning my opinion as to whether the new dances are hay ing a harmful effect in America , I would say that I have never seen them danced ; but from the descriptions of them , from the illustrations I have seen in the papers , from the statements I have read of their origin , I am strongly disposed to array myself with those who are opposed to them . We are not living in & puritanical age , but rather in one of extreme tolerance , The fact that these dances have been so widely denounced by those who are intelligent and reasonable and neither fanatics , nor extrem ists , is sufficient evidence to me that these dances are most ob jectionable and inevitably dangerous to those who engage in them . LOUIS W. BURTON , Episcopal Bishop of Lexington , Ky . are For Individual ' . Conscience . In reply to your request I desire to say that , not being in a position to glve a direct answer to your question , I take the liberty of submitting the following : 1. From Inquiries which I made , I conclude that some of these modern dances to which you refer are vulgar and indecent . 2. Until they have been purgated and all that is evidently objectionable eliminated from them , It seems to me self - respecting persons will refrain from them , No refined young man or lady should participate in a dance the moral character of which is ques tioned . 3. Even dances which are generally approved may be to some individuals , owing to their peculiar temperament , an occasion or wrongdoing , and such persons whould refrain altogether from this diversion . To eum what I have sald : Dances which are regarded as in decent by persons who are familiar with them , and who are known for their prudence , elfuld bo avoided by all ; those dances which are looked upon as proper can be Indulged in , but it rests with the individual's con . science to determine whether such are licit for him or not . HENRY MOELLOR . Archbishop of Cincinnati . מון